Slide 26 of 28
CompleteSlide 26
AG07:2026 — Complete
Insecure Inter-Agent Communication
You've completed all 26 content slides. Here are the six things to carry forward.
Takeaway 1
Agents extend trust to the channel, not the sender. Without cryptographic authentication, any party that can write to the channel can impersonate any agent on it.
Takeaway 2
Authentication and integrity are separate requirements. mTLS proves who sent a message at connection time; message signing proves the content wasn't changed between sender and receiver.
Takeaway 3
Orchestrator impersonation is the highest-impact attack type. The orchestrator has authority over the entire downstream pipeline — impersonating it gives the attacker control of all sub-agents simultaneously.
Takeaway 4
Internal traffic is not inherently trusted. In cloud and containerized environments, "internal" traffic may be readable by compromised services, overpermissioned tools, or shared VPC segments. TLS everywhere.
Takeaway 5
Replay attacks exploit message validity without tampering. A captured genuine message is a reusable attack token unless nonces and timestamps enforce freshness on every received message.
Takeaway 6
MCP and A2A protocols are emerging standards for inter-agent communication. Their security depends entirely on implementation: protocols that don't enforce mutual authentication and signed messages remain vulnerable regardless of the protocol name.
← Restart AG07 ← Back to Course Home